[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Creating empty groupOfUniqueNames..

> I want to create a set of groups that will be used for authorization
> purposes. To me, it seems that a groupOfNames or groupOfUniqueNames will
> best serve this purpose. (Better suggestions?) However, both object
> classes
> require at least one member attribute. There will be times though when a
> member is not known. How do you handle this?
> Right now I create all groups with an invalid member attribute:
> member: cn=invalid,dc=..,dc=..
> Does this break any convention? Is there a better way to handle this?

what I usually do is add the DN of the group itself.


Pierangelo Masarati

    SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497