[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Please keep to pure Openldap .-)
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> ons, 2002-07-31 kl. 09:32 skrev Harry Rüter:
> > generally i agree.
> I'd say that pam/nss_ldap was an integral part of Openldap. If one
> downloads the PADL pam and nss modules and (after compiling and
> installing it succesfully - Linux, of course :-) casts around for the
> supporting stuff, one sees that at least half the "how do I ... ?" pam
> questions and answers on this list are superfluous. People give "their"
> answers, whilst in fact PADL has done all the work for them already.
> Nobody's praised Luke Howard for this yet, as far as I've seen.
> Well, Luke, hereby my congrats and thanks ...
Mine too ...
> Still, I'll keep my mouth shut on this subject in future.
No, i didn't and don't want anybody to keep his
mouth shut on any subject, it was just my opinion nothing else :o)