[Date Prev][Date Next]
At 08:27 AM 11/8/00 +0100, Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl wrote:
>On Sat, 4 Nov 2000, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>> At 02:24 PM 11/4/00 -0800, OpenLDAP Mailing list wrote:
>> >Doesn't this defeat the purpose ?
>> No. The purpose of extensible object is to allow user attributes
>> to exist in an entry. It purpose is not to disable appropriate
>> handling of undefined attribute types.
>Is there no way you can create the attributeTypes dynamically similar to
>the way you can create objectTypes?
A server may support dynamic update of subschema. OpenLDAP doesn't.