[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Backing up LDAP database
Julio Sánchez Fernández wrote:
> Lars Uffmann wrote:
> > This is exactly what I tried. But what about the ordering problem with
> > ldbmcat? ie if the database has more then 256 Entries, ldbmcat swaps
> > it output, the entries are in wrong order! The result is not usable as
> > input to ldif2ldbm.
> Have you tried it? With a recent version? There were old bugs in
> database creation tools that created problems (some indexes would be
> hosed and NEXTID would not be set up properly). I killed those bugs
> months ago. All current branches are supposed to be fixed (2-0 alpha
> uses a different approach now). I don't know for how long that part
> was broken, possibly was broken in the Umich code base already. So
> you might be used to *know* it did not work.
I use openldap version 1.2.6 amd BerklyDB ( I still have to upgrade).
ldbmcats output IS not in the right order. Also, after processing the
last entry, ldbmcat segfaults.
> > I still do backups using a subtree search with
> > '(objectclass=*)' filter.
> Problem is you will start losing operational attributes if you keep
> that approach in 2.0 when it is released.
Sorry my reply comes so late, I've been on vacation the last 2 weeks.
Lars Uffmann, <firstname.lastname@example.org>, fon: +49 5241 80 40330