[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: MDB name
- To: Howard Chu <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: MDB name
- From: Michael Ströder <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:09:11 +0100
- Cc: OpenLDAPemail@example.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1321182553; l=665; s=domk; d=stroeder.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=ssarcIVclsQ9Cua4OtEQLx128Bw=; b=P8VKui8nqCF8N741dpbFjHD6pGO+QU6liGSIRD/TWbBWHUV67zn+XeLUGUZoga9xP+B +6wsBaJGXvZpfzO4jNVg7K84d8zompi9tZ4/qDHY7LZxhdVHhm39C/aN73+WRImmyyGRp odH3TRDs/v0B3AunDRkNfF61ed9Fnyx5o2U=
- In-reply-to: <4EBF9943.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <4EBF9943.email@example.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110928 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1
Howard Chu wrote:
> What's in a name... Apparently "MDB" is already a well-known suffix for
> Microsoft Access database files. "mdb" is also the name of a debugger tool in
> Solaris. To avoid confusion with those unrelated items, it might be a good
> idea to rename our MDB to something else. Now, before the next OpenLDAP
> release is published. Comments?
Is that really an issue given the common practice to refer to it as back-mdb?
I'm pretty sure on will find a lot of name clashes when sticking to three
letter acronyms ending with "db" anyway.
But if you really see a need for changing the name how about simply back-mmapdb?
- MDB name
- From: Howard Chu <firstname.lastname@example.org>