[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: drop "stable"

William King wrote:
> If stable is not dropped, at least have a page for known 'bad problems' for
> the releases. This would help to inform users why they would or would not want
> a particular release.

That's an even more blurry approach than the existing "stable" tag.

My rule is: It's better to have no information than
incomplete/outdated/errornous information.

Ciao, Michael.

> On 11/09/2011 11:19 AM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>> --On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 2:27 PM +0100 Michael StrÃder
>> <michael@stroeder.com> wrote:
>>> => My suggestion: Simply drop "stable" completely and list only the
>>> releases with version number without further qualification. Today most
>>> people can deal with version numbers quite well.
>> I fairly well agree.  OpenLDAP 2.4.23 has a number of serious problems.
>> OpenLDAP 2.4.26 is much more "stable".  I think it is unfortunate that
>> 2.4.23 is still listed as the "stable" release on the downloads page. There
>> may still yet be bugs in 2.4.26, but it is a vast improvement over 2.4.23,
>> 2.4.24, or 2.4.25.
>> --Quanah