Re: ACL check parameters

[masarati@aero.polimi.it]

> Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>> Howard Chu writes:
>>> oprofile shows quite a bit more overhead in 2.4's ACL processing vs
>>> 2.3's. I'm thinking of streamlining things a bit, along these lines.
>>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> Only a few loose ones:
>>
>> A brief look shows some deep indirection, which may be harder for
>> compilers to optimize due to possible aliasing among intervening writes.
>> Maybe you should help by unpacking some more common expressions into
>> local variables.
>
> Profiling showed that the ACLCHECK branch didn't have any improvement over
> HEAD. Looks like it may not be worth the trouble.

Are you going to drop this?

p.