[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: commit: ldap/clients/tools ldapsearch.c
Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
I'm presently thinking it better to lower the effective limit
to the hard limit instead of treating the too high limit
request as an (adminLimitExceeded or like) error.
Doesn't that sort of negate the purpose of the AdminLimitExceeded error
At 02:25 PM 6/21/2004, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
At 11:03 AM 6/18/2004, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
In slapd(8), if the user requests sizeLimit=0, they get the
soft limit. If they request sizeLimit>0, they get that limit
as long as it is not greater than the hard limit otherwise
an error occurs.
s/otherwise an error occurs/otherwise the hard limit is used/
(which is what I think the current slapd(8) behavior is)
I confirm, the current behavior is that an error occurs
if a limit greater than hard is explicitly requested
by the client. I've found the message thread where the
limits behavior was designed. Unless amended in later
messages (I didn't follow the whole thread), this is what
we agreed at the time.
Of course, we can amend it now; however, now the "max"
mechanism allows to directly hit the hard limit, if any.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun
Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support