[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [ldapext] UTF-8 full support in LDIF / LDIF v2
Alexey Melnikov wrote:
There were also suggestions of adding a "charset" specification (yuk).
Is there something we cannot do with Unicode ? I don't understand the
advantage of a "charset" keyword. If anything, I'd rather look at an
I think Unicode is pretty much won the charset war and UTF-8 would be
the best thing to use.
But I think Kurt was just mentioning this as an idea that was suggested.
I went back through the mailing list archive, "charset" came up, but I can't
make sense of who started with it. Assuming we go ahead with UTF-8, does
anybody here have a problem with NOT implementing "charset", to use Unicode
/ UTF-8 only ?
Yes, I believe you need to add a PDF or PS version to the original. I
can look at that. Is there a tradition on how to pick the names for
the example, or is it completely random ?
There is no tradition, you are free to use whatever you like.
Thanks.
--
Yves.
http://www.sollers.ca/
_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext