> incomplete propagation of the update. It would certainly help to know > what they are trying to achieve. If a relatively prompt response is > desired, then the control imposes a requirement on the master to propagate > the update immediately, despite what its replication schedules might say. Again (cf my other mail just now) comparing with AFS waiting an indeterminate amount of time may actually be ok - that is more or less how AFS works today. Cheers Leif
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext