Re: [ldapext] nfsv4 vs the ldap consistency model

To: Howard Chu <hyc@highlandsun.com>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] nfsv4 vs the ldap consistency model
From: Steven Legg <steven.legg@eb2bcom.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:25:03 +1100
Cc: Leif Johansson <leifj@it.su.se>, Ldapext list <ldapext@ietf.org>, Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga@Isode.com>
Delivered-to: ldapext@core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <492A4379.6050603@highlandsun.com>
References: <200811212138.54273.leifj@it.su.se> <53BD252B-CD21-4041-BCED-6802B3231B9F@Isode.com> <200811231612.56659.leifj@it.su.se> <4929F664.3040500@eb2bcom.com> <F32FEA18-89C1-4DA5-911E-17890C8EF67B@Isode.com> <492A4379.6050603@highlandsun.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)


Howard,

Howard Chu wrote:

OK, if we're going to actually discuss this seriously... This is going about the problem the completely wrong way.


You're right there! We need to know the actual requirement or use cases
that motivated Leif's original posting. :-)

Regards,
Steven
_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext

References:
- [ldapext] nfsv4 vs the ldap consistency model
  - From: Leif Johansson <leifj@it.su.se>
- Re: [ldapext] nfsv4 vs the ldap consistency model
  - From: Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga@Isode.com>
- Re: [ldapext] nfsv4 vs the ldap consistency model
  - From: Leif Johansson <leifj@it.su.se>
- Re: [ldapext] nfsv4 vs the ldap consistency model
  - From: Steven Legg <steven.legg@eb2bcom.com>
- Re: [ldapext] nfsv4 vs the ldap consistency model
  - From: Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga@Isode.com>
- Re: [ldapext] nfsv4 vs the ldap consistency model
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@highlandsun.com>