[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [ldapext] groupOfEntries object class proposal

On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:33:00AM +1000, Steven Legg wrote:

> Instead of defining a specific object class, perhaps all we need is a
> *convention* that any entry that contains the member attribute is to
> be treated as a group.

It would still need an object class that permits the member attribute.
How would such a convention represent an empty group?

Andrew
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                 From Andrew Findlay, Skills 1st Ltd                 |
| Consultant in large-scale systems, networks, and directory services |
|     http://www.skills-1st.co.uk/                +44 1628 782565     |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext