Re: [ldapext] draft-zeilenga-ldap-adlist-06.txt

["Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>]

In face-to-face discussions at IETF#58, I learned the concern
was more about the implied semantics of the "+" used in draft.
I agreed to change replace "+" with "@" in this draft to avoid
confusion with "+" other use (zeilenga-ldap-opattrs).  An
new revision will be available soon.

Kurt

At 09:08 PM 11/18/2003, Steven Legg wrote:

>In my experience, user defined object classes reference only user attributes
>and syntax schema object classes (e.g. subentry) reference mostly operational
>attributes. Separate mechanisms for requesting only the user attributes or
>only the operational attributes would not seem to achieve very much.
>
>Regards,
>Steven
>
>Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>>At 02:33 PM 11/11/2003, Jim Sermersheim wrote:
>>
>>>This draft allows the search attribute selection list to be specified as all attributes allowed by a given object class.
>>>
>>>It may be useful to allow the distinction between all user attributes allowed by a given obejct class and all operational attributes allowed by a given object class.
>>
>>While that may be useful, I rather keep this mechanism a simple short hand.
>>That is, I prefer a mechanism where the input can be expanded to the output
>>list of attribute types identifiers without having to know the particulars
>>of these attribute types.
>>Kurt
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Ldapext mailing list
>>Ldapext@ietf.org
>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext


_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext