[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [ldapext] Assert I-D.



Vithalprasad Gaitonde wrote:

But that would mean we have to lock the parent (another entry) in this
operation. All the other update operations required that only the entry
being acted upon is locked.
I guess it has certain implications for server implementors.



Yes you are right.


_______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext