[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Authentication Levels for ACMs

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: Authentication Levels for ACMs
From: robert byrne <robert.byrne@Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 12:29:25 +0200
Cc: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Organization: Sun Microsystems
References: <3AD1BD67.4DF8D55D@Sun.COM> <5.0.2.1.0.20010405131842.01f4fec0@127.0.0.1> <5.0.2.1.0.20010409114144.00aa6ec0@127.0.0.1>

Kurt,

That sounds better as it would be easier to update.

Rob.

"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
> 
> At 10:13 AM 4/9/01 -0700, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> >At 03:47 PM 4/9/01 +0200, robert byrne wrote:
> >>I would like to see your recommended categorisation.  Is your plan that
> >>this would be a seperate document ?
> >
> >My suggestion, if the consensus is to adopt this proposal, would
> >be to include the categorization in the ACM I-D itself.
> 
> On second thought, if there is consensus to adopt such a proposal,
> I might be inclined to write an LDAP-neutral document (BCP?)
> categorizing authentication levels which could be referenced by
> the LDAP (and other) ACMs.
> 
> Kurt

References:
- Re: Authentication Levels for ACMs
  - From: robert byrne <robert.byrne@Sun.COM>
- Authentication Levels for ACMs
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: Authentication Levels for ACMs
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: anonymous & none in the ACM (Was: Comments Access Control Model -authentication levels 2)
Next by Date: browse permission in the ACM
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread