[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Authentication Levels for ACMs

To: robert byrne <robert.byrne@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: Authentication Levels for ACMs
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 11:51:42 -0700
Cc: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
In-reply-to: <5.0.2.1.0.20010409101036.00a9f170@127.0.0.1>
References: <3AD1BD67.4DF8D55D@Sun.COM> <5.0.2.1.0.20010405131842.01f4fec0@127.0.0.1>

At 10:13 AM 4/9/01 -0700, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>At 03:47 PM 4/9/01 +0200, robert byrne wrote:
>>I would like to see your recommended categorisation.  Is your plan that
>>this would be a seperate document ?
>
>My suggestion, if the consensus is to adopt this proposal, would
>be to include the categorization in the ACM I-D itself.

On second thought, if there is consensus to adopt such a proposal,
I might be inclined to write an LDAP-neutral document (BCP?)
categorizing authentication levels which could be referenced by
the LDAP (and other) ACMs.

Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Authentication Levels for ACMs
  - From: robert byrne <robert.byrne@Sun.COM>

References:
- Re: Authentication Levels for ACMs
  - From: robert byrne <robert.byrne@Sun.COM>
- Authentication Levels for ACMs
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: Authentication Levels for ACMs
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: anonymous & none in the ACM (Was: Comments Access Control Model - authentication levels 2)
Next by Date: RE: anonymous & none in the ACM (Was: Comments Access Control Mod el - authentication levels 2)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread