[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Matched values: valuesReturnFilter string representation

To: d.w.chadwick@salford.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Matched values: valuesReturnFilter string representation
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 08:36:04 -0700
Cc: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
In-reply-to: <39F1BF76.18559.F97883@localhost>
References: <5.0.0.25.0.20001017223917.00a7b850@router.boolean.net> <200010171050.GAA07225@ietf.org>

At 04:08 PM 10/21/00 +0100, David Chadwick wrote:
>> where item is as defined by RFC2254.  I suggest the string
>> representation should be specified in the I-D.
>
>Do you mean repeating all the "item" BNF from 2254, or just 
>inserting the 2 lines above. I have assumed the latter and made that 
>change.

I prefer the latter.  However, it would be okay to include
an "informational purposes only" copy the BNF from 2254 if
so desired.

References:
- Matched values: valuesReturnFilter string representation
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldapext-matchedval-04.txt
  - From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- Re: Matched values: valuesReturnFilter string representation
  - From: "David Chadwick" <d.w.chadwick@salford.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Returning Matched Values with LDAPv3
Next by Date: Re: RFC 2596 questions
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread