Re: objectclass of a subschemasubentry

[Helmut Volpers <helmut.volpers@icn.siemens.de>]

I agree:

the SUBENRTY ObjectClass is structural and the
SUBSCHEMA ObjectClass is auxiliary. (in X.501)


Ella Paton Bassett wrote:
> 
> Kurt:
> 
> The subschema object class remains auxiliary. RFC 2252 should include
> the subentry object class. Entries for the subschema would include the
> object identifier for both the subschema object class and the subentry
> object class.
> 
> Ella
> 
> "Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
> >
> > At 02:22 PM 8/10/99 -0400, Ella Paton Bassett wrote:
> >
> > >>From X.501:
> > >13.2.1 The Subentry object class
> > >The subentry object class is a structural object class and is defined as
> > >follows:
> > >subentry OBJECT-CLASS ::= {
> > >       SUBCLASS OF             { top }
> > >       KIND                    structural
> > >       MUST CONTAIN    { commonName | subtreeSpecification }
> > >       ID                              id-sc-subentry }
> > >
> >
> > I take it that's it's your opinion that RFC2252 then is in error
> > and that the subschema object class should be STRUCTURAL.   Do
> > others agree with this?

begin:vcard 
n:Volpers;Helmut 
tel;fax:+49-89-63645860
tel;home:+49-89-1576588
tel;work:+49-89-63646713
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.siemens.com/bus-com/
adr:;;Otto-Hahn-Ring 6;Munich;;81730;Germany
version:2.1
email;internet:Helmut.Volpers@icn.siemens.de
title:Directory Server Architect
x-mozilla-cpt:;30160
fn:Volpers, Helmut 
end:vcard