[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: objectclass of a subschemasubentry

At 02:22 PM 8/10/99 -0400, Ella Paton Bassett wrote:

>>From X.501:
>13.2.1	The Subentry object class
>The subentry object class is a structural object class and is defined as
>follows:
>subentry OBJECT-CLASS ::= {
>	SUBCLASS OF	 	{ top }
>	KIND			structural
>	MUST CONTAIN	{ commonName | subtreeSpecification }
>	ID				id-sc-subentry }
>

I take it that's it's your opinion that RFC2252 then is in error
and that the subschema object class should be STRUCTURAL.   Do
others agree with this?