[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

objectclass of a subschemasubentry

To: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Subject: objectclass of a subschemasubentry
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.Org>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 09:58:35 -0700
Resent-date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 10:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-from: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Resent-message-id: <"oFi5TB.A.gAF.KqFs3"@glacier>
Resent-sender: ietf-ldapext-request@netscape.com

OpenLDAP's default subschemasubentry (cn=schema) list "subschema",
"extensibleObject", and "top" as objectclass values.  I just
realized that "subschema" is defined in RFC2252 as AUXILIARY
and as such our subschema subentry is without a STRUCTURAL
objectclass.

What is the recommended STRUCTURAL objectclass for subschema
subentries?

Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: objectclass of a subschemasubentry
  - From: Ella Paton Bassett <egardner@mitre.org>

Prev by Date: RE: Returning single values from multivalued attributes
Next by Date: Re: objectclass of a subschemasubentry
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread