[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: correct modifiersName and modifyTimeStamp behavior?



Mark Wahl wrote:
> 
> Given that it is not clear in  X.500 I would recommend that we
>  1) submit a 'defect report' on X.501 to clarify exactly what operations
>     cause user-visible operational attributes to be updated, then
>  2) copy this clarification into the following update to 2251.
> 
> Would you like to submit the defect report to the X.500 committee?

Great suggestion.  Since I've never submitted an X.500 defect report,
I'll need to do some research into the process.  But I'll work on this
fairly soon and share the text with the LDAPEXT list before I submit it.

-- 
Mark Smith
iPlanet Directory Architect / Sun-Netscape Alliance
My words are my own, not my employer's.   Got LDAP?