[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ADSI and RFC 2251

At 02:29 PM 7/15/99 -0500, Mark Wahl wrote:
>
>There is no CONTEXT PRIMITIVE 9 in the choice in the bind request defined
>by any IETF document.  Some old code from this vendor used nonstandard
>tags as there were no SASL framework defined for v2.  1777 defines 0, 1 and 2,
>and 2251 defines constructed 3.  Since there is a SASL framework for v3, the
>vendor MUST use an appropriate SASL mechanism.  Perhaps you are recieving a 
>bind from a client that is thinking it is still in a v2 world? I recommend 
>that your implementation should return a notice of disconnection and close the 
>connection.

Is a notice of disconnect actually appropriate in this case?
I would think that a BindResponse:protocolError would be more
appropriate per 4.1.1.

Kurt