[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: LDAP extensions for subtrees.

To: Bruce Greenblatt <bgreenblatt@dtasi.com>
Subject: Re: LDAP extensions for subtrees.
From: dboreham@netscape.com (David Boreham)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:22:24 -0700
Cc: Mark Smith <mcs@netscape.com>, Jim Sermersheim <JIMSE@novell.com>, ietf-ldapext@netscape.com, John Merrells <merrells@netscape.com>
References: <3.0.6.32.19990622210650.00910e10@pop.walltech.com> <3.0.6.32.19990623090741.00912a90@pop.walltech.com>
Resent-date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-from: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Resent-message-id: <"3Wb_WB.A.OPC.jfQc3"@glacier>
Resent-sender: ietf-ldapext-request@netscape.com

Bruce Greenblatt wrote:

> operations from a transaction log.  What do you think?  I think that it
> ought to be possible to save a snapshot of the LDAP database, store off a
> serialized sequence of operations, and then replay them, and come up with
> the same end result time after time.

This is precisely the worry I have with this proposal !
What if the database is 200Gbytes ? Do you tell your
customers to reserve 200Gbytes of space on the off-chance
that they'll want to delete a subtree one day ?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LDAP extensions for subtrees.
  - From: Bruce Greenblatt <bgreenblatt@dtasi.com>

References:
- Re: LDAP extensions for subtrees.
  - From: Bruce Greenblatt <bgreenblatt@dtasi.com>
- Re: LDAP extensions for subtrees.
  - From: Bruce Greenblatt <bgreenblatt@dtasi.com>

Prev by Date: Re: LDAP extensions for subtrees.
Next by Date: Re: LDAP extensions for subtrees.
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread