Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ldapext-ldapv3-dupent-00.txt

[Erik Skovgaard <eskovgaard@geotrain.com>]

David,

Ah yes, the lightbulb switched on here after a second reading :-)

I withdraw my comments.

Cheers,                     ....Erik.

At 14:21 98/11/25 -0800, David Boreham wrote:
>  Erik Skovgaard wrote: One major beef I have with your document is the
>rather casual use of 
>  What you are trying to address is the multi-valued 
>  An Entry in the Directory is the
> Are you sure ? instantiation of an Object Class complete with all the
>attributes that 
>describe the instantiated object.
> Certainly, and this isn't at odds with the document, I don't think. Seems
>to me that the document deals with the server returning 
>multiple duplicate _entries_. Indeed it does this as a consequence 
>of those entries having multiple values for some attribute, but 
>I disagree with your analysis that this requires a different title 
>and that the issue is multi-valued attributes per se. To me your suggested
>title is a backward step in terms 
>of relevance to the content. Anyway, how about some discussion about the
>content 
>rather than the title of the document ? Who think's it's a good/bad idea ? 
>Why ? It wouldn't be hard for us to implement, so I 
>can't object on those grounds. It seems to be 
>genuinely useful to some classes of client. 
>  
>