[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: LDAPv2 with draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-c-api-01
Hi,
Jochen Keutel wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> >Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
> >
> >> Anyway, general and safe translation between T.61 (in LDAPv2) and
> >> UTF-8
> >> is impossible because the client may not know the attribute types of
> >> all
> >> the attributes, and binary attributes should not be translated.
> >
> >Did anyone actually use T.61 ?
>
> we had to use something more than IA5 (with LDAP V2) because we are in Germany.
> There was the choice of using either latin1 (ISO8859-1) or T.61; the LDAP V2 servers I'm aware of supported at least one of these character sets. We usually used latin1.
I think it is not easy and perhaps not the best choice to fix this problems inthe C-API. I think a LDAP-server which supports V2 and V3 should be
able to return different Codesets on a V2 connection. (by configuration)
Helmut
>
>
> Bye,
> Jochen.
begin: vcard
fn: Helmut Volpers
n: Volpers;Helmut
adr: Otto-Hahn-Ring 6;;;Munich;;81730;Germany
email;internet: Helmut.Volpers@mch.sni.de
title: Directory Server Architect
tel;work: +49-89-63646713
tel;fax: +49-89-63645860
tel;home: +49-89-1576588
x-mozilla-cpt: ;0
x-mozilla-html: FALSE
version: 2.1
end: vcard