[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ldapext-referral-00.txt

To: howes@netscape.com (Tim Howes)
Subject: Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ldapext-referral-00.txt
From: Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 17:20:05 +0000
Cc: D.W.Chadwick@iti.salford.ac.uk, ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Content-id: <883.890587204.1@isode.com>
Delivered-to: ldapext-archive@critical-angle.com
In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 21 Mar 1998 10:40:45 -0800. <351409AD.EA04476F@netscape.com>
Resent-date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 09:20:28 -0800 (PST)
Resent-from: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Resent-message-id: <"F6GdT3.0.2p3.NXK5r"@glacier>
Resent-sender: ietf-ldapext-request@netscape.com

Ok, so I now understand why it is version 00 (which made me think it
was new).   I STILL can't remember any discussion about it before.
Do you know how much many people reviewed the ASID version of the
document?


Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ldapext-referral-00.txt
  - From: howes@netscape.com (Tim Howes)

References:
- Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ldapext-referral-00.txt
  - From: howes@netscape.com (Tim Howes)

Prev by Date: Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ldapext-referral-00.txt
Next by Date: Re: LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ldapext-referral-00.txt
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread