|
I searched for this yesterday but must have had my search criteria wrong. I have now fixed section 3.1.4. Section C.0 is a historical record of changes made to the document and will disappear as the draft moves to an RFC, so I'm not going to change it.
Roger
>>> Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> 10/20/2005 3:46:15 pm >>> Roger Harrison writes: > Authmeth-16 is no longer using the term graceful closure. I believe this > issue is now adequately resolved. Please let me know if you disagree. Actually, the draft still talks to about graceful TLS removal/closure in 3.1.4 and C.0. Don't know if that was a mistake or intentional. It's not very important anymore, sinced the original issue is fixed. (A long client-specific sentence is gone, and a wrong [Protocol] section). -- Hallvard |