[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: authmeth-15 notes

To: Roger Harrison <RHARRISON@novell.com>
Subject: Re: authmeth-15 notes
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:46:15 +0200
Cc: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <43567DDE.DBA8.00BF.0@novell.com>
References: <hbf.20050923ecmo@bombur.uio.no> <4337F19C.DBA8.00BF.0@novell.com> <hbf.20050927q6hw@bombur.uio.no> <434E39D3.DBA8.00BF.0@novell.com> <hbf.20051013l7lf@bombur.uio.no> <43567DDE.DBA8.00BF.0@novell.com>

Roger Harrison writes:
> Authmeth-16 is no longer using the term graceful closure. I believe this
> issue is now adequately resolved. Please let me know if you disagree.

Actually, the draft still talks to about graceful TLS removal/closure
in 3.1.4 and C.0.  Don't know if that was a mistake or intentional.

It's not very important anymore, sinced the original issue is fixed.  (A
long client-specific sentence is gone, and a wrong [Protocol] section).

-- 
Hallvard

Follow-Ups:
- Re: authmeth-15 notes
  - From: "Roger Harrison" <RHARRISON@novell.com>

References:
- Re: authmeth-15 notes
  - From: "Roger Harrison" <RHARRISON@novell.com>
- Re: authmeth-15 notes
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: authmeth-15 notes
  - From: "Roger Harrison" <RHARRISON@novell.com>

Prev by Date: Re: authmeth-16 TLS issues
Next by Date: Re: authmeth-15 notes
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread