|
Kurt,
Your opinion was to remove requirements on using the DIGEST-MD5 authentication mechanism in such a way that the DIGEST-MD5 spec was no longer normative. I support your approach as outlined in
http://www.openldap.org/lists/ietf-ldapbis/200509/msg00024.html
and I would recommend that we remove section 10 (SASL DIGEST-MD5 Authentication Mechanism) from authmeth and simply refer to RFC2829 as an informative reference on this mechanism.
Roger
>>> "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org> 10/5/2005 8:20:39 am >>> At 06:42 AM 10/5/2005, Roger Harrison wrote: >I've made this change to the requirements section of authmeth. The next question is what to do with section 10 (SASL DIGEST-MD5 Authentication Mechanism). Should we remove it from the ldapbis specification and allow it to be referenced as part of RFC 2829, or should I leave it in the ldapbis specification for informational purposes? As co-chair, I think we need some more discussion on this. As an individual contributor, I offered my opinion (and specific recommendation) in: http://www.openldap.org/lists/ietf-ldapbis/200509/msg00024.html Kurt |