Re: LDAP terminology proposal

[Ludovic Poitou <Ludovic.Poitou@Sun.COM>]

Yes, fine with me.

Ludo

Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:

> At 09:07 AM 11/15/2004, RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote:
>
>  
>
> > On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> >
> >    
> >
> > > The terms would be defined as follows:
> > >
> > >       "connection" refers to the underlying transport services
> > >     used to carry the protocol exchange, as well as
> > >       associations established by these services.
> > >      
> > Sorry to continue teasing at this as I know we want to close on it, but let me suggest "transport connection" rather than just "connection".  I think this would be more consistent with the use of that phrase in the TLS spec.  And it would make all the terms two words (or two strings, at least).
> >    
>
> I have no problem with this suggestion.
>
> Kurt 
>
>  

--
Ludovic Poitou
Directory Architect.
Directory Server Group, Grenoble, France
Sun Microsystems Inc.

Sun Microsystems requires the following notice:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE:  This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy
all copies of the original message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~