[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: LDAP terminology proposal

To: "RL 'Bob' Morgan" <rlmorgan@washington.edu>
Subject: Re: LDAP terminology proposal
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:44:59 -0800
Cc: IETF ldapbis WG <ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411151204380.23273@perp.cac.washington.edu>
References: <6.1.2.0.0.20041109134102.03279cc0@127.0.0.1> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411151204380.23273@perp.cac.washington.edu>

At 09:07 AM 11/15/2004, RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote:

>On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>
>>The terms would be defined as follows:
>>
>>        "connection" refers to the underlying transport services
>>      used to carry the protocol exchange, as well as
>>        associations established by these services.
>
>Sorry to continue teasing at this as I know we want to close on it, but let me suggest "transport connection" rather than just "connection".  I think this would be more consistent with the use of that phrase in the TLS spec.  And it would make all the terms two words (or two strings, at least).

I have no problem with this suggestion.

Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LDAP terminology proposal
  - From: Ludovic Poitou <Ludovic.Poitou@Sun.COM>
- Re: LDAP terminology proposal
  - From: "RL 'Bob' Morgan" <rlmorgan@washington.edu>

References:
- LDAP terminology proposal
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: LDAP terminology proposal
  - From: "RL 'Bob' Morgan" <rlmorgan@washington.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: LDAP terminology proposal
Next by Date: Re: LDAP terminology proposal
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread