Re: LDAP terminology proposal

["RL 'Bob' Morgan" <rlmorgan@washington.edu>]

OK, I believe we have consensus on this new terminology, and so direct the 
document editors to revise the drafts accordingly.  This affects the 
protocol and authmeth drafts, and maybe the url draft, but not any of the 
others as far as I can tell.

 - RL "Bob"

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:

> At 09:07 AM 11/15/2004, RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> >
> > > The terms would be defined as follows:
> > >
> > >        "connection" refers to the underlying transport services
> > >      used to carry the protocol exchange, as well as
> > >        associations established by these services.
> >
> > Sorry to continue teasing at this as I know we want to close on it, but let me suggest "transport connection" rather than just "connection".  I think this would be more consistent with the use of that phrase in the TLS spec.  And it would make all the terms two words (or two strings, at least).
>
> I have no problem with this suggestion.
>
> Kurt