Re: T.61 -> Unicode conversion

["Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>]

At 10:42 AM 11/9/2004, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>Hallvard B Furuseth writes:
>> There have been quite a lot of disputes about whether characters in
>> different character sets are equivalent or not, though I don't know if
>> that applies to T.61->Unicode mapping.
>
>Come to think of it, I probably do know: Stringprep Appendix A says it's
>based on RFC 1345 (an informational RFC, not a standard) rather than a
>Unicode mapping or some X.500 work, and also that makes corrections to
>the RFC 1345 mapping.  (If RFC 1345 is standard in the X.500 community,
>please mention that in the appendix.  I'm assuming it's not.)

I'm not aware of a standard T.61->Unicode mapping (nor a
standard Unicode->T.61 mapping).

However, once published, draft-ietf-ldapbis-strprep will
provide a Standard Track T.61->Unicode mapping.

Kurt