[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: DIGIT in xstring (was: models-09 comments)

To: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: DIGIT in xstring (was: models-09 comments)
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:58:26 +0100
In-reply-to: <6.0.0.22.0.20040107093334.0410cd18@127.0.0.1>
References: <HBF.20031221t15e@bombur.uio.no> <6.0.0.22.0.20031224110949.041efa60@127.0.0.1> <HBF.20040107vq80@bombur.uio.no> <6.0.0.22.0.20040107093334.0410cd18@127.0.0.1>

Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
>At 09:03 AM 1/7/2004, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>>Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
>>>At 08:45 AM 12/21/2003, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>>>>draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-09.txt says:
>>
>>>>>       xstring = X HYPHEN 1*( ALPHA / HYPHEN / USCORE )
>>> 
>>>>Should xstring allow DIGIT?
> (...)
> Such a change would make older implementations of LDAP
> incompatible with newer implementations of LDAP.

Oh, so it's an 'informal semi-standard'.
Agreed, better to leave that alone.

-- 
Hallvard

References:
- Re: models-09 comments
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- DIGIT in xstring (was: models-09 comments)
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: DIGIT in xstring (was: models-09 comments)
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Protocol: control specifications.
Next by Date: Re: protocol: ASN.1 for Attribute
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread