[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ABNF of numericoid

To: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: ABNF of numericoid
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:05:46 +0100
In-reply-to: <HBF.20031208sa69@bombur.uio.no>
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030714102517.01d53a78@127.0.0.1> <024e01c35736$a7615450$a518200a@osmium.mtwav.adacel.com.au> <HBF.20031207voev@bombur.uio.no> <6.0.0.22.0.20031207182135.027aa078@127.0.0.1> <HBF.20031208sa69@bombur.uio.no>

I wrote:
> Leading zeroes.  (1) and (3) allow the <number> components but not
> the spelled-out components to have leading zeroes.  Which is right?

Sorry, ignore that.  I must have looked cross-eyed on the definition of
<number>.

-- 
Hallvard

References:
- ABNF of numericoid
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Re: ABNF of numericoid
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: ABNF of numericoid
  - From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>

Prev by Date: Re: ABNF of numericoid
Next by Date: Re: draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-01 comments
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread