[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: DN-alt issues

To: mcs@netscape.com (Mark C Smith)
Subject: Re: DN-alt issues
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 07:53:56 -0700
Cc: "RL 'Bob' Morgan" <rlmorgan@washington.edu>, Scott Seligman <scott.seligman@sun.com>, IETF ldapbis WG <ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020821073301.04c7c350@127.0.0.1>
References: <3D639DFF.5040705@netscape.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208210155020.3574-100000@localhost.localdomain>

At 07:40 AM 2002-08-21, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>>I agree, but we could also agree on a new definition for the table. Our goal is clarity and interoperability, but we also do not want to retroactively label a lot of LDAP deployments as "non standard" if we do not have to.
>
>draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn causes, to the best of my knowledge, to
>become "non standard".

I meant:
        draft-ietf-ldapbis-dn causes, to the best of my knowledge,
        no existing implementation to become "non standard".

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DN-alt issues
  - From: mcs@netscape.com (Mark C Smith)

References:
- Re: DN-alt issues
  - From: mcs@netscape.com (Mark C Smith)
- Re: DN-alt issues
  - From: "RL 'Bob' Morgan" <rlmorgan@washington.edu>
- Re: DN-alt issues
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: DN-alt issues
Next by Date: Re: DN-alt issues
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread