Re: 'dc' and 'uid' in User Schema

[rvh@qsun.mt.att.com (Richard V Huber)]

In principle, I agree it makes sense to pull everything into the User
Schema I-D.  But in the specific case of dc, I wonder if it wouldn't be
better to leave it separate, because I suspect it will need to be
revised once the IDN WG's direction becomes clear.

Rick Huber

: Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:47:32 -0700
: To: ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org
: From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
: Subject: 'dc' and 'uid' in User Schema
: 
: RFC 2253 says 'dc' and 'uid' needs to be recognized by LDAP
: implementations which are described in RFC 1274 (and 2247).
: 
: Like other information we need to extract from RFC 1274, I
: suggest we incorporate the specification of 'dc' and 'uid'
: directly into the User Schema I-D.  I note that RFC 2247,
: Section 4, provides an updated specification of 'dc'.  Also,
: RFC 2798 provides an LDAPv3 attribute type description for
: 'uid'.
: 
: Please note this is not a call to suck in all of RFC 1274
: defined schema, but only that schema which the LDAPv3 TS
: relies on.
: 
: Comments?
: 
: Kurt