RE: implementation quiz: ;binary

["Steven Legg" <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>]

Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> Please provide a separate response for each application of
> interest.  There is no need to respond if you have not
> implemented ;binary transfer of attribute types.  This is
> only a partial quiz aimed at getting a general idea of the
> level of interoperability.
 
Implementor: Adacel Technologies
Application: View500
Application Class: [ ] client, [X] server

> Have you implemented ;binary transfer of attributes?

Yes.
 
> Is this support specific to particular syntaxes and/or attributes?
> If so, which syntaxes and attributes?

No. All supported syntaxes can be ;binary transferred.

> Do you support non-;binary transfer for any syntax and/or
> attribute which you support ;binary transfer for?

Yes. Each syntax with an LDAP string encoding can also be
transferred as ;binary.

> Does your application ensure values it sends using ;binary are
> restricted to a valid BER encoding of the attribute's syntax?

Yes.

> Does your application treat non-BER encoded values received
> using ;binary as an error?  If so, what error?

Yes, invalidAttributeSyntax.

> Does your application treat BER encoding of values of incorrect
> using ;binary as an error?  If so, what error?

Yes, invalidAttributeSyntax.

> Does your application expect values to be encoded using a
> subset of BER?  If so, which subset?

No. Any legal BER encoding according to X.690 is accepted.

> 
> Comments:
> 
>