RE: DN "a published table" clarification (a solution?)

["Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>]

One approach might be to add to the end of 2.3.

  Note: A closed deployments of LDAP [1] MAY prescribe an
    alternative table of attribute type name strings
    to be used a local string representation of the
    distinguished names.  This specifications do not
    ensure the interoperability of local string
    representations nor that a particular local string
    unambiguously represents a distinguished name nor
    does this specification detail security considerations
    related to the use of alternative tables.
    The use of alternative tables is NOT RECOMMENDED.

Note that I offer this without any opinion (yet) as to
its appropriateness for inclusion in the I-D.