[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: DN "a published table" clarification (a solution?)
I THINK that works for me. Of course, it follows that
interoperability needs to be verified.
[mailto:owner-ietf-ldapbis@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of Kurt D. Zeilenga
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 3:13 PM
Subject: RE: DN "a published table" clarification (a solution?)
One approach might be to add to the end of 2.3.
Note: A closed deployments of LDAP  MAY prescribe an
alternative table of attribute type name strings
to be used a local string representation of the
distinguished names. This specifications do not
ensure the interoperability of local string
representations nor that a particular local string
unambiguously represents a distinguished name nor
does this specification detail security considerations
related to the use of alternative tables.
The use of alternative tables is NOT RECOMMENDED.
Note that I offer this without any opinion (yet) as to
its appropriateness for inclusion in the I-D.