Re: RFC 2255bis

["Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>]

At 10:38 AM 10/25/00 -0400, Mark C Smith wrote:
>What I am thinking about is moving some of the information about which
>components of the URL are required and not allowed and the defaulting
>rules into subsections that are specific to each of the above
>scenarios.  Comments?

One approach would be to define "general" defaulting rules
which apply in lieu of more specific defaulting rules mandated
for specific uses as detailed in other documents (such as
RFC2251bis).

I suggest we avoid enumerating "other uses" but clearly
indicate that they are allowed.