[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: RFC 2255bis
At 12:40 PM 10/25/00 -0600, Jim Sermersheim wrote:
>I believe the additional constraints can be added to the end of the URL as optional elements. This would not inherently add to the complexity of the LDAP URLs that people are used to seeing. It simply provides more consistency.
I generally concur that having additional constraints would be generally
useful. They would provide more consistency... but they would also
require add additional complexity to the specification (and to
implementations) especially in regards to search continuation handling.
However, the question for LDAPbis to answer is not:
what changes to LDAPv3 would be generally useful?
what changes are required to progress the LDAPv3 to Draft Standard?