[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: 2.1.17 performance issues

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: 2.1.17 performance issues
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 00:58:30 +0200
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.0.20030416100111.02808698@127.0.0.1>
References: <249142658.1050482856@cadabra.stanford.edu> <55802.168.91.2.45.1050436404.squirrel@mail.ivytech.edu> <20030416141441.GC5203@conectiva.com.br> <57311.168.91.2.45.1050509915.squirrel@mail.ivytech.edu> <5.2.0.9.0.20030416100111.02808698@127.0.0.1>

Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
>At 09:18 AM 4/16/2003, John Madden wrote:
>> For now, 2.0.27 on ldbm/GDBM is blazingly-fast.
> 
> You should find ldbm/GDBM in 2.1 even faster (as well
> as more stable).

Faster than ldbm/berkeley?

-- 
Hallvard

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.1.17 performance issues
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

References:
- Re: 2.1.17 performance issues
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- 2.1.17 performance issues
  - From: "John Madden" <jmadden@ivytech.edu>
- Re: 2.1.17 performance issues
  - From: Andreas <andreas@conectiva.com.br>
- Re: 2.1.17 performance issues
  - From: "John Madden" <jmadden@ivytech.edu>
- Re: 2.1.17 performance issues
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Ldap authentication
Next by Date: RE: 2.1.17 performance issues
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread