[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: 2.1.17 performance issues



At 03:58 PM 4/16/2003, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>Kurt D. Zeilenga writes:
>>At 09:18 AM 4/16/2003, John Madden wrote:
>>> For now, 2.0.27 on ldbm/GDBM is blazingly-fast.
>> 
>> You should find ldbm/GDBM in 2.1 even faster (as well
>> as more stable).
>
>Faster than ldbm/berkeley?

For Berkeley DB v GDBM debates, I defer to the archives.
Personally, I gave up on GDBM ages ago.

I will say that you should find LDBM/berkeleyDB in 2.1 faster
(and more stable) than LDBM/berkeleyDB in 2.0.

Kurt