[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: unclear documentation about openldap ACL definitions



Florian Best wrote:
> Am 30.06.2016 um 11:29 schrieb Michael Ströder:
>> Setting the privileges is IMO sufficient.
>>
> I see this differently. One example where this is useful would be the
> following:

Maybe I do not fully understand your aim but...

> I would like to e.g. add a rule at the very top of all ACL definitions:
> 
> "access to attrs=uidNumber value=0 by * none stop"
> 
> But this prevents that any other rule afterwards can make it *readable*.

...then don't do this. ;-)

Seriously: <who> clauses are also ordered. Simply use several of them in access
directive(s) with one passing control flow with "break".

Ciao, Michael.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature