[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Samba auth on replicated LDAP: no admin user

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>, openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: Samba auth on replicated LDAP: no admin user
From: Paul van der Vlis <paul@vandervlis.nl>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 22:43:00 +0100
In-reply-to: <900C9BF4AD18DAF50DE2E2C0@[192.168.1.9]>
References: <566435DB.3000706@vandervlis.nl> <363A237F4AD8A7AEAB888AA7@[192.168.1.9]> <5664A516.4090401@vandervlis.nl> <900C9BF4AD18DAF50DE2E2C0@[192.168.1.9]>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.4.0

Op 06-12-15 om 22:27 schreef Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> --On Sunday, December 06, 2015 10:13 PM +0100 Paul van der Vlis
> <paul@vandervlis.nl> wrote:
>
>> ldapsearch -x -b "cn=admin,dc=domain,dc=nl" -H ldapi:///
> 
> The above is an anonymous search. Do your acls actually allow results to
> be returned with anonymous searches?

Yes. Something like this gives "0 Success" on the replicated server:
ldapsearch -x -b "cn=paul,ou=users,dc=domain,dc=nl" -H ldapi:///

And the ldapsearch with cn=admin works fine on the master.

With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.

-- 
Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen
https://www.vandervlis.nl/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Samba auth on replicated LDAP: no admin user
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

References:
- Samba auth on replicated LDAP: no admin user
  - From: Paul van der Vlis <paul@vandervlis.nl>
- Re: Samba auth on replicated LDAP: no admin user
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: Samba auth on replicated LDAP: no admin user
  - From: Paul van der Vlis <paul@vandervlis.nl>
- Re: Samba auth on replicated LDAP: no admin user
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Samba auth on replicated LDAP: no admin user
Next by Date: Re: Samba auth on replicated LDAP: no admin user
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread