[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Antw: Re: Structural object issues
>>> Philip Guenther <email@example.com> schrieb am 13.11.2013 um 09:25
in Nachricht <alpine.BSO.firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> >>> Quanah Gibson-Mount <email@example.com> schrieb am 13.11.2013 um 02:24 in
>> Nachricht <90CA8980100EF12CE4C38252@[192.168.1.93]>:
>> > --On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 6:03 PM -0600 Alex Moen <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Any advice on this? What would the proper way to fix it be?
>> > Add a structural objectClass to the entry. All objects are required to
>> > have a basic structural objectClass.
>> Sure? slapadd needs it, but ldapadd refuses to accept a structural
>> objectclass specification in my experience.
> The original poster was trying to add this LDIF:
> dn: uid=maxUid,ou=ndtcadministration,o=ndtc
> objectClass: top
> objectClass: extensibleObject
> uidNumber: 55083
> 'top' is an abstract object class, while extensibleObject is an auxiliary
> object class, so none of that entry's object classes are structural object
Ah! You ment the value, not the tag; I thought you were talking about the tag...
> Philip Guenther