[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Antw: Re: Structural object issues

On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> >>> Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com> schrieb am 13.11.2013 um 02:24 in
> Nachricht <90CA8980100EF12CE4C38252@[192.168.1.93]>:
> > --On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 6:03 PM -0600 Alex Moen <alexm@ndtel.com> 
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> Any advice on this?  What would the proper way to fix it be?
> > 
> > Add a structural objectClass to the entry.  All objects are required to 
> > have a basic structural objectClass.
> 
> Sure? slapadd needs it, but ldapadd refuses to accept a structural 
> objectclass specification in my experience.

The original poster was trying to add this LDIF:

dn: uid=maxUid,ou=ndtcadministration,o=ndtc
objectClass: top
objectClass: extensibleObject
uidNumber: 55083

'top' is an abstract object class, while extensibleObject is an auxiliary 
object class, so none of that entry's object classes are structural object 
classes.


Philip Guenther