Re: OpenLDAP as an address book for MS Outlook

[Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su>]

Michael Str?der wrote:
> >>>>> "Be liberal in what you receive and conservative in what you send" is
> >>>>> a good old rule.
> >>>>
> >>>> If you change the subschema subentry you change something sent to the client.
> >>>
> >>> I still don't understand what's so bad about being able to request the
> >>> ordering of the 'cn' attribute.
> >>
> >> Actually the client could request that.
> > 
> > The client does request that, it seems, but OpenLDAP produces an error. 
> > It requests a SortKeyList control on the attribute 'cn'. But OpenLDAP
> > returns an error.
> 
> No it does not what I meant..
> 
> > Here is the conversation for you inline:
> > [..]
> >             Control
> >                 controlType: 1.2.840.113556.1.4.473 (sortKeyList)
> >                 criticality: True
> >                 SortKeyList: 1 item
> >                     SortKeyList item
> >                         attributeType: cn
> >             Control
> >                 controlType: 2.16.840.1.113730.3.4.9 (LDAP_CONTROL_VLVREQUEST VLV)
> >                 controlValue: 308400000012020100020127a08400000006020101020100
> 
> ..as you can see above. Please read my posting more thoroughly.

Please rephrase your posting in more mundane words. 


-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru