[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Segfault during Auth Benchmark request



Hi,

Thanks for this information.

I look on backtrace with gdb and I have got this one. I hope this is
what your except.

I join more detail, could you read it?

Thanks,


Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1132489024 (LWP 11645)]
0x0000003c024082e9 in pthread_mutex_lock () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
(gdb)  backtrace full
#0  0x0000003c024082e9 in pthread_mutex_lock () from
/lib64/libpthread.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#1  0x00000000004c7ea1 in hdb_cache_delete_cleanup ()
No symbol table info available.
#2  0x00000000004c897c in hdb_cache_modrdn ()
No symbol table info available.
#3  0x00000000004c9384 in hdb_cache_find_id ()
No symbol table info available.
#4  0x00000000004cd193 in hdb_dn2entry ()
No symbol table info available.
#5  0x00000000004a6513 in hdb_search ()
No symbol table info available.
#6  0x00000000004314b6 in fe_op_search ()
No symbol table info available.
#7  0x0000000000431c47 in do_search ()
No symbol table info available.
#8  0x000000000042fa5b in connection_hangup ()
No symbol table info available.
#9  0x0000000000430157 in connection_hangup ()
No symbol table info available.
#10 0x000000000051f15a in ldap_pvt_thread_pool_submit ()
No symbol table info available.
#11 0x0000003c024062e7 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#12 0x0000003c018ce3bd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.



-----Original Message-----
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount [mailto:quanah@zimbra.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 7:25 PM
To: Luca Scamoni
Cc: SAGNIMORTE Thomas (CAMPUS); openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: Segfault during Auth Benchmark request

--On Wednesday, April 22, 2009 7:23 PM +0200 Luca Scamoni
<luca.scamoni@sys-net.it> wrote:

> Quanah Gibson-Mount ha scritto:
>> --On Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:52 AM +0200 "SAGNIMORTE Thomas
>>
>>> I set entry cache to 100000, idlcache to 10000 and dncache to 10000.
>>
>> Seems reasonable.
>
> Since cachesize is 100K entries shouldn't idlcachesize be 300K ? (he's

> using hdb backend)

Hm, I read that all as 10k.  I'm guessing that a 100k cachesize and a
10k idlcachesize wouldn't be greatly productive, but I've often run my
HDB backends with the same cachesize/idlcachesize without ill effect.

--Quanah



--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

Attachment: gdb-slapd2.txt.zip
Description: =?US-ASCII?Q?gdb-slapd2=2Etxt_Compresse?=